Str8 Gangster, No Chaser Reviews – Hell In A Cell

Hell In A Cell is my favorite match of all time. You could put a fucking booger and Lex Luger in there and not only would it kick ass, but Luger would win. Well, maybe. We’ll say it’d be a double knock-out. Yeah, there are no rules like that in a Hell in a Cell match, so we’ll say it took place in WCW in 2000. Dig it. Let’s get to the review…

The Package: Looks sharp. Has a slip-on case. Inside there’s a two-page pamphlet that has the match listing, as well as various pictures. Same goes for the DVD package it self. It’s a tri-fold, and we get photos from the various wars through out the years. Very not-suck.

Non-Match Segments: The little interludes with Mick are great. He offers little facts here and there as well as his two cents whenever possible. Another great aspect is that they give you the video packages that explain why this match is taking place, which is awesome because then you have more investment in the match itself.  Unfortunately, there are no easter-eggs, which is odd because the ‘E usually drops one here and there.

The Matches:

Shawn Michaels © vs. The Undertaker – Bad Blood – October 5th, 1997
The Review: It’s the one that started it all. As DX was in full swing and made it impossible for either Shawn or HHH’s opponents to get a leg up because someone was bound to interfere. They had the cage at SummerSlam to keep Chyna out of HHH and Mankind’s match, but the big, blue cage proved to be useless in that facet.  So with Taker still hot on Shawn’s tail, they came up with Hell in a Cell. Which was basically the Omni-Cage from an NWA event in the mid-80’s, if I recall. I remember watching this match live on PPV and being pissed at Kane appearing. Not as pissed as the next night on Raw when everyone had signs that read ‘Cain’ when it was obvious it was spelt Kane. Anyways, the match rules all, but doesn’t get the full monty because of the stupid ending. Like the Undertaker wouldn’t have broken out of the Tombstone when it took Kane that long to execute it.
The Rating: * * * * 3/4th

Stone Cold Steve Austin & The Undertaker vs. Mankind & Kane – Raw – June 15th, 1998
The Review: This is nothing more than a segment, really. As nothing note worthy happens here. Undertaker doesn’t come out when he’s suppose to. Paul locks himself in the cage. Wonder what will happen next? Yup.
The Rating: No Rating

Mankind vs. The Undertaker – June 28th, 1998
The Review: I saw this one on PPV, and the spots obviously blew me away. As they should anyone. But you only need to see this match once, and that’s it. Other than the spots, it sucks. As Foley is clearly on dream street, but get’s uber-man credits for continuing. I always thought he was truly the toughest SOB in the WWE.
The Rating: * * * * * for what it is to history, but truly, it’s a ** star match

Mankind vs. Kane – Raw – August 24th, 1998
The Review: Almost too short to review. Although they started with a nice base, and this could have really been something.
The Rating: * * 1/2th


Triple H © vs. Cactus Jack – Title vs. Career – No Way Out – February 27th, 2000

The Review: Goddamn, it took them FOREVER to put this on DVD while I had to sit and watch collection after collection have the street fight from the Rumble on it. Sure, the street fight was great, but this was better. I never really looked at this as Mick’s retirement, just a long hiatus for him so he can heel up and come back to deliver the best matches of his career. As for this one, just total awesomeness. They took the street fight it and amplified, I thought. The fact that Jack gets up and still fights after falling through the cage is a great way to end anyone’s tenure.
The Rating: * * * * *

Kurt Angle © vs. Rikishi vs. The Rock vs. Undertaker vs. Triple H vs. Stone Cold – Armageddon – December 10th, 2000
The Review: Jesus. Would you look at that line-up? Besides Rikishi, it’s like you made the most impossible dream match or something. So you’d think something like that, in my favorite style of match would have created something of epicness. You’d be wrong. There was just too much going on, and all it was was punching and kicking, and some brawling onto cars. Other than Rikishi’s fall, there’s nothing note worthy. While it isn’t a horrible match, it doesn’t live up to what the marquee says.
The Rating: * * * 3/4th

Triple H vs. Chris Jericho – Judgment Day – May 19th, 2002
The Review: For some reason, this match doesn’t get put on people’s shoulders, and I don’t know why. Jericho has always been great, and this was just before Triple H got fat, wore different color wrestling trunks, and f’ning sucked. So it’s all goodies here. It’s not just an all out brawl, but a great wrestling match with some great brawling. Not to mention the ending is the first, and last time we’ve seen that, so hoorah I say.
The Rating: * * * * 1/2th

Brock Lesnar © vs. The Undertaker – No Mercy – October 20th, 2002
The Review:
Ugh. This is probably the only actually HIAC match that two guys can have and not break the 4 star rating. Lesnar is great, but Biker-Taker was SO crappy. All he did was sit around and punch, and talk about his yard, and refuse to do shit. I didn’t like the broken-hand thing, as I thought it made Brock look less tough because he felt he needed to break the Taker’s hand to get a leg-up. No odd pun intended. The match was at least bloody and carried enough by Brock for me to enjoy it. Pissed I still hunted down the No Mercy DVD a couple years back just to see it.
The Rating: * * * 3/4th

Triple H © vs. Kevin Nash – Guest Ref: Mick Foley – Bad Blood – June 15th, 2003
The Review:
This match is famous for 2 reasons; 1. People thought it was going to suck so bad. 2. Mick Foley came back after 18 months. I for one, never thought it was going to suck, because that’s the beauty of HIAC. It’s damn near impossible, unless you’re Biker-Taker, to have a bad match. Sure, Nash is broken down at this point, and Triple H was at the laziest he’d ever been, but this match kicked ass. Nash was in rare form, not being sluggish the least-bit, and Triple H rocked it too. Hell, I felt Foley wasn’t even needed. This is a true underdog.
The Rating: * * * *


Triple H © vs. Shawn Michaels – Bad Blood – June 13th, 2004
The Review:
Wow. This match goes deep. I often crave matches with an ‘epic’ feel, and this one does just that. Triple H and Shawn have their 1 millionth match together, and don’t disappoint. This bad-boy goes 40 minutes plus, and really only tends to drag come the last 10 minutes or so. But it’s an impressive sight to see just how tired two humans can get. It’s also crazy to see how long it takes HBK to get up after the match is over.
The Rating: * * * * 1/4th


Batista © vs. Triple H – Vengeance – June 26th, 2005 –
The Review:
Boy howdy. Although the most recent HIAC with Edge and Taker is my all time fav, this one can often make a case for being number 1. Goddamn, does it own. From barb-wire chairs that leave puncture wounds all over Batista’s back, to Triple H spraying blood when caught in the chin with the sledge-hammer, this match doesn’t let up for one second. The first time I watched it, I was alone and still said out loud “I fucking LOVE this match!”. A true classic.
The Rating: * * * * *

The Undertaker vs. Randy Orton – Armageddon – December 18th, 2005
The Review:
Ah The Legend Killer. He was admits his tour when he came to fight the legend to beat all legends, The Undertaker. And where else do you prove your worth to the Deadman? But in HIAC. This is one is very underrated, as I rarely hear people talk about it. It takes another approach that is one of the many that HIAC can offer. Where’s most tend to do the weapons and such, this one actually uses the space, and the cage as the weapon. It’s a truly well fought match-up. They go all over the damn thing, and Randy Orton really proves his worth here. It’s an awesome bout.
The Rating: * * * * 1/4th

D-Generation X vs. Shane McMahon / Vince McMahon / The Big Show – Unforgiven – September 17th, 2006
The Review:
I dunno. There was just something missing from this. I think what it is, is that when it comes to a match with Vince, you’ve got to use a lot of weapons, a lot of gimmicks, and make up for the fact it’s a senior citizen in there. Had it been Big Show and Shane, it’d be a different story. As Big Show is ok in a hardcore setting, and Shane, well, he’s Shane. There were hardly any weapons used here, and it was just a bit of a boring, bloody affair. Although in the end, when Shawn looks at what took place, and you can see the look in his eye that says he’s truly disgusted it went this far, it gives the match a quarter of a point or two.
The Rating: * * *

Batista © vs. The Undertaker – Survivor Series – November 18th, 2007
The Review:
Ah, the blow-off from what will probably go down as my favorite feud as far as match quailty goes. I was giddy when I found out that Taker and Batista would settle their hash in a HIAC. My favorite feud from that year, my favorite match, how could it go wrong? Surely it did not. They did everything right, and hit on all cylindirs. Hell, Batista even rocked the powerbomb through the table, when 99% of the time it just turns into a back-drop. Cripes all Friday! I would have liked a pinch more brutality, and had a clean ending. Those are the only two things hindering this from a full monty.
The Rating: * * * * 3/4th


The Diagnosis:
10/10 – Str8 Gangster, No Chaser. If my house was burning, this would mos def be the DVD set I grab. With 8 matches ranking at 4 stars or more, and 7 matches ranking HIGHER than that, you can’t go wrong. Damn near every match is epic, and would be a high-spot on anyone’s Ten Best of That Year.

Advertisements

~ by Caliber Winfield on November 21, 2009.

7 Responses to “Str8 Gangster, No Chaser Reviews – Hell In A Cell”

  1. This review is absolutely terrible. You’re not a writer. You’re just an idiot with an ugly blog. You’re not creative, you are not a critical thinker. You wrote your favorite feud in terms of MATCH QUALITY is Batista v. Underatker. So you are saying that of all the feuds in ALL of wrestling, you think the one that produced the BEST wrestling matches is Batista v. Undertaker? And we’re supposed to take you seriously?

    Stop it. Just please stop it. You’re an absolute idiot.

  2. I like where Joe said “you’re not creative, you’re not a critical thinker”, as if that was the qualification to write about wrestling on the internet. So many great creative minds sitting around watching wrestling tapes and working out what Scott Keith thought of them so they can put the ratings on a website no-one reads.

    Joe, you are a cunt.

  3. If you don’t want me to read the insipid tripe you post on your shitty little blog here, then don’t post it.

    And just because your boyfriend called me a cunt doesn’t mean I’m going to stop.

    DJ, you’re a fucktard. Anyone who’d defend this asshole is at best retarded or at worst the retarded asshole who sucks his dick while he types, “man, Triple H was great once and now he sucks.” I mean, that’s some real cutting edge, biting commentary right there. No wonder this blog is visited by like, what, 10 people a week?

    Also make note of how awesome and correct all my punctuation is. You dickholes could learn a lot from me.

  4. Joe, you are very smart. I’m so happy you have great punctuation. You’re so smart in fact, you realized that DJ posted both of those comments. Neither one was from me. But, hey, you say you’re smart so I believe you.

    Please, come here and read all you want, man. It’s what it’s here for.

    Oh, and DJ, watch out. If you make him any angrier he’ll type a super-mean message at you and make you worship his punctuation. After he’s done reading all my articles for a 3rd time that is.

  5. I’m the only one reading this shitty blog, besides you and your girlfriend DJ. You should appreciate the extra hits.

    I mean, why else would you gone onto websites infinitely cooler than yours to leave comments with a “signature” file inviting people to visit?

  6. Do you not like yourself, Joe? That’s the only explanation I can think of as to why someone would waste their valuable time on a guy’s insignificant blog that they don’t even like.

    Anyway, you’re right about Jericho/HHH from 2002. I thought that was a great match in a feud that for the most part sucked balls. I haven’t seen the Hell in a Cell PPV yet, but hopefully they’ll keep up the high match quality that HIAC brings out in the years to come.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: